您的位置: 标准下载 » 协会标准 » ASTM 美国材料与试验协会 »

ASTM G1-2003 腐蚀试样的制备、清洁处理和评定用标准实施规范

作者:标准资料网 时间:2024-05-14 09:15:42  浏览:8104   来源:标准资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载
【英文标准名称】:StandardPracticeforPreparing,Cleaning,andEvaluatingCorrosionTestSpecimens
【原文标准名称】:腐蚀试样的制备、清洁处理和评定用标准实施规范
【标准号】:ASTMG1-2003
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:
【发布日期】:2003
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国材料与试验协会(US-ASTM)
【起草单位】:G01.05
【标准类型】:(Practice)
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:腐蚀;磨损;金属;试样制备;试样;清洁处理;试验;评定
【英文主题词】:cleaning;corrosionproductremoval;evaluation;massloss;metals;preparation;specimens
【摘要】:Theproceduresgivenaredesignedtoremovecorrosionproductswithoutsignificantremovalofbasemetal.Thisallowsanaccuratedeterminationofthemasslossofthemetaloralloythatoccurredduringexposuretothecorrosiveenvironment.Theseprocedures,insomecases,mayapplytometalcoatings.However,possibleeffectsfromthesubstratemustbeconsidered.1.1Thispracticecoverssuggestedproceduresforpreparingbare,solidmetalspecimensfortests,forremovingcorrosionproductsafterthetesthasbeencompleted,andforevaluatingthecorrosiondamagethathasoccurred.Emphasisisplacedonproceduresrelatedtotheevaluationofcorrosionbymasslossandpittingmeasurements.(Warning8212;Inmanycasesthecorrosionproductonthereactivemetalstitaniumandzirconiumisahardandtightlybondedoxidethatdefiesremovalbychemicalorordinarymechanicalmeans.Inmanysuchcases,corrosionratesareestablishedbymassgainratherthanmassloss.)1.2Thisstandarddoesnotpurporttoaddressallofthesafetyconcerns,ifany,associatedwithitsuse.Itistheresponsibilityoftheuserofthisstandardtoestablishappropriatesafetyandhealthpracticesanddeterminetheapplicabilityofregulatorylimitationspriortouse.Forspecificprecautionarystatements,see1and7.2.
【中国标准分类号】:H25
【国际标准分类号】:77_060
【页数】:9P.;A4
【正文语种】:


下载地址: 点击此处下载
基本信息
标准名称:石墨电极
中标分类: 建材 >> 炭素材料 >> 石墨材料
替代情况:原标准号GB/T 3072-1982;被YB/T 4088-2000代替
发布日期:
实施日期:1993-07-01
首发日期:
作废日期:2000-12-01
出版日期:
页数:10页
适用范围

没有内容

前言

没有内容

目录

没有内容

引用标准

没有内容

所属分类: 建材 炭素材料 石墨材料
Product Code:SAE J2517
Title:Hybrid III Family Chest Potentiometer Calibration Procedure
Issuing Committee:Dummy Testing And Equipment Committee
Scope:This procedure establishes a recommended practice for establishing the sensitivity of the chest displacement potentiometer assembly used in the Hybrid III family of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, or crash dummies). This potentiometer assembly is used in the Hybrid III family to measure the linear displacement of the sternum relative to the spine (referred to as chest compression). An inherent nonlinearity exists in this measurement because a rotary potentiometer is being used to measure a generally linear displacement. As the chest cavity is compressed the potentiometer rotates, however the relationship between the compression and the potentiometer rotation (and voltage output) is nonlinear.Crash testing facilities have in the past used a variety of techniques to calibrate the chest potentiometer, that is to establish a sensitivity value (mm/ (volt/volt) or mm/ (mvolt/volt)). These sensitivity values are used to convert recorded voltage measurements to engineering units, in this case chest compression in mm. Some of these techniques intended to correct for the nonlinearity and others did not. Of those that did correct for the nonlinearity, there was a variation in techniques used. This variation in calibration procedures was in part identified by the SAE Dummy Testing Equipment Committee (DTEC), and led to overall variability in chest compression measurements between laboratories. The intent of this recommended practice is to minimize the variations in chest deflection measurements between crash testing laboratories. Before this procedure was written, a round robin showed variations for the Small Female of 10% among 8 labs for the chest pot sensitivity value. A follow-up round robin of this procedure showed a worst case variation of 2.7% among 10 labs, with a standard deviation of 0.9%. The initial version of J2517 released in May 2000 attempted to fix this problem by recommending a two-point calibration which was not intended to correct for the nonlinearity (which, for example, is as large as 3% for the Small Female but is small near the peak). It also did not require the measurement of a starting position of the potentiometer before each crash test, thus it did not correct for the difference in starting chest geometry between a subject dummy and its design intent. It was intended to be a simple and reproducible calibration procedure which crash test facilities could easily adopt with little or no modifications to their facilities. In practice, most laboratories did not adopt the procedure since it did not correct for the nonlinearities.Recent attempts to reduce dummy-to-dummy and lab-to-lab variations at lower deflection levels (around 25 mm) have renewed interest in adopting a calibration procedure to correct for the nonlinearity of the measurement system. This current revision of this procedure uses a multipoint calibration with a third order regression to correct for the nonlinearities of the system with a standardized method. It requires changes in the calibration method of the transducer, the data collection procedures when used in a dummy, and the processing procedures after test data is collected. Following this standardized methodology will minimize linearity errors as well as lab-to-lab variations.